<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Applications and Innovations</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3060-7124</Issn>
      <Volume>1</Volume>
      <Issue>Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Application and Inovations</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>PPFL: Privacy-Preserving Techniques in Federated Learning</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>PPFL: Privacy-Preserving Techniques in Federated Learning</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>49</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>67</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.61838/jaiai.1.3.6</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>24</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;Federated Learning is a distributed machine learning paradigm designed to preserve user privacy on decentralized devices without transferring raw data to a central server. Protecting data privacy in FL involves determining permissible operations and how they can be executed. This review provides an in-depth exploration of privacy threat models within FL, distinguishing between scenarios where the central server is either trusted or untrusted, and identifying appropriate defensive tools and technologies for these settings. The review covers secure computational techniques, including MPC, HE, and TEEs, as well as privacy-preserving mechanisms such as DP, LDP, and DDP models. It also examines hybrid approaches that combine multiple privacy models to enhance efficiency and robustness. The effectiveness of these methods is analysed across different scenarios involving both honest and potentially malicious servers and users. The findings reveal that while privacy-preserving methods mitigate risks, challenges persist in trade off privacy, communication efficiency, and model accuracy. This review highlights open research directions and serves as a comprehensive reference for researchers and practitioners seeking to implement robust privacy measures in federated learning systems.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Federated Learning</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Privacy Preservation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Differential Privacy</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Homomorphic Encryption</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Multi-Party Computation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Trusted Execution Environments</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.journalaiai.com/index.php/aiai/article/download/35/19</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
